If you don't need an "home made" solution I would definitively go for Google Analytics and between the open source projects I would choose Open Web Analytics as it's more mature then Piwik. Open Web Analytics and Pikwik are great open source solutions.īoth are quite mature and stable but they require MySQL database and PHP support. W3Counter and Xiti are providers that require you, for the free version, to install an image on each web page you want to monitor. Regarding Page tagging The winner is surelly Google Analytics, has the data collected and produced is better than the other solutions, but as one day may happens that Google will ask money for it. This provides valuable insight on what you think are keywords vs. Analog if you need really accurate statistics, huge log files and you have C development experience (or you know anybody who can help). An AWStats traffic report has many great pieces of information contained in it.Webalizer if you have tons of log files to analyze.It usually wasnt a ton, so I didnt worry about it. How can I see the traffic of a given hour of a given day in Awstats I need to know who visited what pages in 23 PM of the 13/Dec. AWStat in the case you need don't have too many GB of files and you want a nice graphical representation. Last year, when comparing Awstats to Analytics, Awstats showed fewer pageviews/etc. I have installed and configure Awstats on my server to see its traffic.Google Analytics vs CPanel AWSTATS vs Webalizer vs Analog Stats. Discover more great videos on our website and be part of the community. W3Perl if you want granular statistics and you don't have too many GB of log files Watch Traffic Stats Comparison: Google Analytics vs CPanel AWSTATS vs Webalizer vs Analog Stats for free, here on Sebae.I advice you these links for further info: Many webmasters are familiar with such programs as Awstats and Webalizer which were the top free contenders in this space and then there were higher-end. They differ from each others for the data produced and the way the data is rendered.ĪWStat displays statistics in a really attractive manner, but produce less statistics then W3Perl. Webalizer is not developed anymore but it's easier then Analog to be used.ĪWStat and W3Perl are written in Perl and they are the most active projects, but are faraway slower then Analog and Webalizer (3000/4500 lines per second). In the log files analyzer domain, these are the most widely used:Īnalog and Webalizer are written in C and are the faster (10000-20000 lines per second).Īs mentioned earlier by Analog has been developed by an ex-Cambridge statistician, that makes Analog a really precise and technical tool, but since the year 2005 it's not developed anymore.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |